The case of the headless bodice!

-

Here is the first cover for my new HQN Regency series, The Brides of Fortune, which will be coming to a bookstore or internet bookseller near you in June! I am SO excited to see the covers for my new series, which are all in this beautiful style. Over the next few weeks I'll be posting all the covers and some juicy details about the series!
I've noticed that the "headless bodice" cover seems to be increasingly popular with publishers and has featured on historicals by Phillipa Gregory, Elizabeth Chadwick and Mary Balogh, amongst others. In this case of course the heroine isn't totally headless, just cut off somewhere around the nose. And whilst this may not sound very attractive, I think the cover looks gorgeous. But what do YOU think? Do you like covers where there's a little bit of mystery about the appearance of the hero or heroine, or do you prefer a full face version or even a full body version of hero and heroine together? Let me know!

Comments

Jan Jones said…
Oh! I want that dress!

(Actually, I'd quite like a waist, too, but you can't ask for too much in this world.)

To answer the question - I like a bit of mystery, and I like the cover to reflect what's inside the book.
21 March 2009 at 19:52
Wendy said…
I know some readers don't like them - but I love the trend of Headless People covers. Adds a bit of mystery - and there's less likely to be a mistake made by the art department! "But the heroine has red hair? Why does she have blonde hair on the cover?"
22 March 2009 at 01:51
juliemt said…
Absolutely gorgeous cover, Nicola! I'm sure that it will fly off the shelves.

I love these kinds of covers. As Jan said, they add a bit of mystery and they allow the reader to picture the characters as they are described in the book rather than as they are depicted on the cover.

Hugs,
Julie
22 March 2009 at 14:01
Nicola Cornick said…
LOL, me too, Jan. I'd like a dress AND a waist to put in it!

Wendy, that was the Kidnapped cover, wasn't it. I did point out to my editor that the heroine was a redhead, but to no avail. Checking with my HH colleagues I hear this happens with covers quite a lot (sigh.) It was a very pretty cover but I must admit that I do prefer my HQN ones.

Hello Julie! I'm so pleased that you like it. And I agree that it does allow readers to use their imagination to fill in the picture of what they think the character looks like.
22 March 2009 at 17:50
Wendy said…
Nicola: LOL - yeah. I actually loved the cover for Kidnapped. I thought it was very pretty. "But, but, but....the heroine has red hair!" LOL
22 March 2009 at 18:19
Nebula said…
That's funny; I never thought of equating the appearance of the person on the cover with the heroine of the book--I guess this comes from reading so much science-fiction, where the cover is often just a weird abstract drawing that is meant to convey something scientific! But I do like the cover of your new book--the colors are rich and sensual.
23 March 2009 at 11:05
Nicola Cornick said…
Thank you, Nebula. I'm glad you like it! The colours are very rich and vibrant, aren't they. Interesting that you don't usually equate the person on the cover with the heroine. I think I usually notice the cover but then develop my own idea of the characters as I'm reading.
23 March 2009 at 11:20
Gillian Layne said…
It's the kind of cover that would have me buying the book without even knowing the author. Gorgeous! :)
5 April 2009 at 18:03
Kate Hardy said…
It's lovely. And I'm with Jan. I'd like that dress (and the figure to go with it). Gorgeous colours, too.

(Mind you, your name on a book always means I'm going to enjoy the contents. Currently enjoying Unmasked.)
6 April 2009 at 07:56
Nicola Cornick said…
Thank you all very much! I've seen the finished version of all the covers now and I am totally besotted with them! I think the cover goddess was definitely smiling on me this time round! And I'm so pleased you are enjoying Unmasked, Kate. Thanks so much!
6 April 2009 at 11:37
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Books of Your Childhood.

-
Image
This is a fantastic meme from Michelle Styles for anyone who loves to talk about books, especially the books that captured you when you were a child and are still with you now. Name at least one book that you read as a child (ie 11 or under) that still exists in your memory as a perfect story. You can say why if you wish, or simply give a list -- your choice. It can be a story that you are now uncomfortable about having loved or were uncomfortable at some point and have now come back to or alternatively just one that you have always loved. Here is my list: 1. A Traveller in Time by Alison Uttley. History fascinated me even as a child, as did the idea of stepping back in time. I’ve been hooked on timeslip romance ever since! 2. The Weirdstone of Brisingamen by Alan Garner. I could name just about every Alan Garner book for this list. I was totally hooked on his writing. The combination of adventure, magic and something just a little bit strange and spooky fascinated me. Plus the fact
Read more

Farewell to the rugged look!

-
Image
As you know, I'm all for blogging about hot-looking actors in period costume. Any excuse! So an article in the Observer newspaper at the weekend was a bit of a gift. Under the headline of "Farewell to the rugged look as new male beauties sweep all before them" it suggested that the leading men of film and TV are becoming interchangeable. Gone are the days of actors with such individual looks and charisma as Marlon Brando and Al Pacino and in there place are bland clones. Among the new breed of actors cited were Zac Efron, Edward Pattinson and Jonathan Rhys Myers, whose appealing baby eyes apparently sealed the role of Henry VIII in The Tudors (odd when you think about it, since of all the things that Henry was renowned for, his baby face wasn't one of them). Experts claim that these boy-men are chosen for their cherub cheeks and gentle jaws, and that women prefer them because they associate these softer looks with fidelity and warmth. So what is going on? What happen
Read more

A Brief and Selective History of Swimming!

-
Image
I've taken a longer-than-expected break from the blog over the past couple of weeks due to a terminally stubborn set of book revisions that simply refused to work. I knew there were problems with the manuscript and, hard as I worked to fix them, my writer's intinct told me that there was still something wrong even when I had finished draft 2. I tinkered, I re-wrote, I changed one thing which led to another which brought the whole thing down like a pack of cards. I had a fabulously helpful set of revision notes from my editor but still I could not do it. I cried. I comfort ate. I didn't sleep. Now I have draft 3, a sleep deficit, and no idea whether the book is any good since my judgement is shot to pieces. I love being a writer. Anyway, now I've emerged into the daylight I see it is a beautiful hot sunny day so to get back into the blogging I decided to post a piece about aspects of the history of swimming, some of which is taken from an article I read in the Daily Tel
Read more